![]() |
|
Part of the click2.com.au network |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
||
![]() |
Please read
carefully our disclaimer before using this message board ! Earlier this week, sources said the Justice Department was likely to propose a breakup. But there had been reports the states were having trouble agreeing among themselves, and were even further from agreeing with the Justice Department. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ordered the Justice Department and 19 states to file their proposed remedies this Friday after he ruled on April 3 that Microsoft violated the nation’s antitrust laws. Jackson said a majority of states could file separate proposals if they were unable to agree with Justice. They have now agreed to file a joint proposed remedy, the sources said, although a few states may file minority remarks. 'EXCESSIVE PROPOSAL' The proposal would delay the breakup of Microsoft until the appellate process is complete, but in the meantime impose restrictions on the firm’s conduct. Microsoft will file its reply on May 10, when it will oppose the government’s plan and suggest its own. “There’s nothing in the existing trial record to support this kind of excessive proposal, which is clearly outside the scope of the case,” said Mark Murray, a spokesman for Microsoft. “There would need to be months of discovery, depositions and hearings in order for the court to review such a radical step,” Murray said. The government will in turn file further views on May 17 and Jackson will conduct a hearing on May 24. source cnbc |